Natural basis of geoecological processes in the region Župa Aleksandrovačka

K
BULLETIN OF THE SERBIAN GEOGRAPHICAL SOCIETY
2008.
LXXXVIII - . 1
YEAR 2008
TOME LXXXVIII - N 1
UDC 911.3:504(497.11)
M



.
А

А

:

А

А

А

А

,

. O

,

,

,a

.
,

,

-


.

,

,

ђ

.
.
:

,

,

,

,

,

Abstract: Natural basis is a complex, dynamic and meaningful geospatial category. Although its intensity is
subject to changes, it is both a permanent determinant of social development and a physical basis of geoecological
processes. Due to its own development tendencies and more intensive and various anthropogenic influences, the
relation between natural basis and human society is characterised by a specific structure and dynamics of
geoecological processes. In the case study of the region Župa Aleksandrovačka (despite its small territory),
geoecological processes are characterised by a number of specific and detectable morpho-physionomical and
morpho-functional elements and relations. Such a structure of geoecological processes provides geographical
homogenity and individuality to the region of Župa Aleksandrovačka.
Key words: Natural basis, geoecological process, relief, drainage area, basin, ecology

,
,

-

.
.
.
:
:

XVII
.
1927, .
.T
, 1987,


,

,
,

,

1929, .
1969, .
.
1987,

XX
1945, .
1976, A.
, 1983,
. .
1998.
.

А.

,

,

,

,

-

,
,
: .
, 1960,
. .

.
,
,
1927, .
.
1986,

,

,

,

-

.
146010
.

1962,
-

3/3,

.
3/3,

.

,

54

(Churchill Semple
E., 1911, Hartschorn R., 1939, Taylor G., 1951, Huntington E., 1962, McHarg I., 1971
)
,
,
.
ђ
(
)
.
(
. ., 2001;
. .,
.,
., 2007)1.
ђ
.
XX

. Troll (1968., 1970.)
.

(

. Geoecology)

,
-

. Zonneveld (1990)

,
,

,

,

,

-

.
,
,
(eng. Landscape architecture).

,

,


,

.
“,

ђ -

.
e,


ђ



2

,
. ., 1870)

– 1196. (
1197.



” („COZNO“) (
,

., 1974).



.

,

)
(

,

ђ

),
ђ

,

(

.

-

ђ ,

.


).
,
-

,
,

ђ

(

,
.

,

ђ
,

,

?

1



,

“(

,

),
(

)

ђ

.
,

-

-

,
.

2

ђ

,

,
.

,

,

.,

55










(

.

., 2006).

,
,



-

(

,

),

,

.
-

160 − 258 − 387 − 420
(200
700 m . )

1.000 km2.
17 km

.
11

., (1980)
12 km.
-

)3

(

4

.

(386,55 km2).
,

,
(

,

,

).

1.
(1 –


;2–

;3–

;4–

.

)

ђ
,

,

.
(1492 m)

ђ
81,1%)

(313,46 km2,

.
(
(L=220 km

)

F=15.468 km2).

:
55,16%,

,
(52,79 km2

3

4

-

.

, 100,26 km
),

13,66%

,

XIX

– 213,2 km2
25,94%.
-

,
.
,

“−



2

-

,

,

.

56

(163,5 km2),

(1150-1250 m . .)
(L=244 km F=7.985 km2) –
(L=31 km F=261 km2)5.
(
20,3 km2)
,
.

,

-

.„
,

ђ

., Ђ

“(

., 1991).
-

-

(

)



.

(

)

,
)

-

(

.

ђ

.,

)6.

.

,

ђ .

ђ

.„
,

“(

(

., 1995).

2.

-

5

(2.758 km2)

(199 km2).

– 66,3%.
6


(

,


)

.



-

57


,

7

-

),

(

,

ђ ,

-



-

.

)

-

(

(
-

,

),

.
.8
,

.

(
,

,

,

,

,

,

-

,

.)
.

,
,

,

.
.

,

,

-



(

)
70

(

500

200

)

200
.
, -

(

)
,

,
.

,
.
(
).
(

,
.

-

. 1995).

,
,

.


“(
1991).

.

,

.,
-

9

-

−„

Ђ

,

“(


.

. 1976).

-

“,

-

,
(

.

. 1976).
(

)
-

7

e
.
-

.

., (1995)
.

-

8

-

., (1964)


“.

9

ђ

,
(


-

-

., Ђ

. (1975),

.

),

-

-


(


., 1987).

.
-

58

.

-



,
)10

(
ђ

,

.

-

(

)
,

.
- (

.

. 1976),

-



.
(

-

),

-

.
(
1991).

Ђ


.


“(

.


(

. 1976).

Ђ

.

.,

-

., 1991).
,

,
(

(

., 1954).

., et. al. 1976),
,

,

(

-

., 1958).

.


(

11

)

)

,

,
., 1961).

.

(

.

ђ

(

ђ

(

),

,
(

ђ

-

.,

., 1961).
.
,
(

)

,
)

(

.
,
(
., 1958).

,

“).

,
-

(
(

(
0,4 m,
5m

,


)

., 1958).
., (1958)
,

0,3–
,„
“.

(

)

.
,



.

-

.
,
.
10

85

25 km).

(17,54
(

11

10.000 km3,
)
ђ


24 ±3 × 106

2100 km2 (
-

., 1995).

.

(
(

,

,
,

,
,

-

),
).

59
12

.

(
(540 m),

-

)

(490 m . .)

,

,
.

ђ

13

(

-

.

).
.

,

,
.

,

,

ђ

,

-

.
-

(

1600 m),
., 1971).

(400–800 m) (
(NNW–SSE).
.
mm/ . ( ђ
),
2–4 mm/
.
,
1–2 mm/
(
., 1971).

-

(

-

5


)
,

, .
( > ),
)

(

ђ

(

).

,

-

,
,

.
.

,

-


je

.
40 m

20

,

„V“

ђ ,
1978–1984.

.
,

.

.
,
-

(
).
-

(
),
230 m . .



(

)

-

,
.

., (1964)
.

,
(

)



.
.

12

(

.
).

,

,

,

-

(


.
- 560 m .

-

).

13

(

50 km2.
20 km2 (40%

1:100.000)

¼

,

– 480 m . )

,

.

60

,

,
.

.

-

,
/
(

,

,

,

,

,

, ...).
,

,

.
177 m . . –
(

2m
1785 m . . –
(
10,2 .
:
(
- 1123 m,
- 1542 m,
- 1785 m
(
ђ
(
)

)
.
.
),
(
),

),
, - 1418 m,
- 1779 m, )14,

),
,
ђ - 1350 m,
- 1645 m,

- 1216 m,
- 1557 m,

)
(

(
(

),
– 166,68 km2

.
-

,
(7–15
.

20–30 m . .)
(

)
.
– 144,27 km2 (37,32%),
– 1,7 km2 (0,44%)
,
,
.
,

(43,11%)
73,95 km2 (19,13%)

,

190 m/km2,



.
(60–100 m/km2).

(10–60 m/km2)
,
),
(

),
)


),

ђ

(

ђ

500 m/km2.
,
(
,

( .

),

(

-

.

.

ђ

a

.
,

.
-

.
.
,
.
,

14

(

,
(

,
29

1000 m.

,

)
).

ђ

.„

,
-

,

,

61


.

,
)

,
-

(

,
(800–1200 m3/km2).

.
.
.),

(

),

,

-

ђ

(



,
џ

,

.
,

,
.

,

,
.




,

3 km.

3.

.
.

.

,

,

400 m . .

,
ђ

390 m . ,

-

,

.
,

-

,

,

,
.

,

.
,

/

/
ђ

.
,

.
.

.
(

.
-

)

-

62



15

,

.
-

,
(
.

,

ђ

,

),

.



:

,

,

,

.

-

,

(
)
(

,

,

)
.

.
,

ђ

.

,
,

-

,
.

ђ
,

,

(

,

.)
,

,

-

.
,

(

)

.

4.

(

)

180 km2
46,56%,
.
,
60,9:15,35 km2
15,75%:3,97%.
6 km2
1,6%
(N–N )

(N+NW+NE) 124,22 km
E W

-

(S–S )
-

.
(

ђ )

(S+SW+SE)
32,13%

.
:

,
,

15

.

,
,

., (1964)

.
je

a

a

700-750 m . .

-

63

(
(

)

)

(


ђ ,

)
16
.

-

“–
,
17
.

,

33 km

,

,

35 km
(

-

-

., 1995)18.

(

-

)
.

,

ђ ,

.

,

-

.

-

,





.

.

(

),

19

,
.

,

-

,
,

,
.

,

.
,
,
(

., 1995).
,



,
(

,

,

,

-

,

)

.
,

,

-

.
,

18–22 km (
600
700 C,

)

,
.
(

)

.

(



),

16

17

-

(
ђ ,

(

)

)

-

.
,

.

-

,

.
18
19

(1987).

.
-

. (1990)

35-40 km.
.,

64
6

1978.

3 20

(60×10 m )

1978–1984

.

.
,

-

(
),
,

,

,

.
,

21

22

(

.

.

(U, Th, K),

,
)
,

.,

,

(
., 1995)23.
.
,

.

)

-

(

.

(

)

,

-

,
.

,
.

,
., (1922)

.



“(
. ., (1976),

:

-

ђ

.

., 1995),

., 1962)24

“ (Ђ

. .
,

., (2006)

.
,

,

-

,
,

,
(



.

)

(

20

)
„Vc“
,

-

:

1,3×1010 t

-

-

(60×1010 m3),
.

.
21

-

-

.
.

.

(1990)

.

22

-6

23

-

.

.
)

2,4 × 10 W/m3 (
Ђ ђ
., (1995)
1:100.000

4 ppm U, 16 ppm Th
.
. 1995).

2,2% K.
(

-

.
24

ђ
1947–1960.
.
: 1926–1927, 1930–1940, 1942–1946.

.

ђ

,

-

65

,

.

,

,

(
,

)

.
-

,

.
,
,

ä

.
,

700 m . .
.

25


(359 m . .) 11,0 C,
., 1962)26.
(-0,8 C).
Ђ
1947-1960.

21,3 C (Ђ

-

.
(20,5 C),

., (1962)
65,1 C ( max +40 C;
.
. -

min -25,1 C).
,

,
(22.

),

(1.

).

,


.

256

“.

(14.

– 29.
3.594 C.
,

3.960 C,
.
75

.
(10. IX – 23. XI).
– 11,3 C)
111
30,41%
81
(13. III – 3. VI)27.
,

20,55%

(
,
98 (4. VI – 9. IX),

-

).

-

,
.
(24. XI – 14. III).
(

620 mm).

.
.

-

25

,
., 2004)



(

.,

.,



.
,



“.

,
,
,

(

,

,

.

ђ

,

,

)

XII

XIII
-

.

ђ

,

ђ 800-1300
1400.
(
(

,



-

,

.„
)
).
,

.

.

ђ

,

XIX
)
.

“,

.
1600,

ђ 1400



.

,
(

,

,

,
(Vitis vinifera L.)
.
,
,

,

(

)


(

.)

,
.
1950–1994.
21,9 C (

26

27

,
-





10,6 C,
5 C,

., 1995).

18 C.

-

66

,

.

,
,

.

-

(81 mm)

(37 mm)

-

(72 mm),

(39 mm).
.

,

2,19
),

.
.
,

(
.
,

,

(

510‰

28

)

,

.

,
.

,

,
(6,6

.

,
16


),

(3,5

,
)

.
(
,

700 m),
-

:
. ,

,
700-1200 m . .

.
,

,
-

,
,

,

.
,

ђ

-

,
.
800–900 mm,
(590 m . .),

1640 mm
(

,

1955.

., 1995).

(
)

-

,

ђ

.

(

)

,

,

ђ

.
,

-

.
-

-

,
ђ

.
.

,
.
28

.
-

.

.

-

67

,

,
.

,

,

-


,

-

-



.

-

,
(

,

(

),

(

)

ђ
,

)
ђ

.
,

-

,
,

-

,

ђ
,

.

, . (1961). К

, .
. (1980).
-

Ј

,

,
,

. (1958).


X,

2,

,

,

100

,

.

,

, . (1995).

.

,


,
, ,

,

-

.
-

К

,

,

.

.

,

.

,

,

.

,

4. Ј

,

. (1987).
,
20,
. (1995).
. LIX,
,
. (1995).

. 30,
,

“,

, . (1976).
,
, . (1997).
,
, ,
,
,

,

,

,
,

-

.
,

.2,

-

.
,

К

,

-

.
, .

,

. (1995).
К

,
,

-

.
,

.

, . (1990).
, 1:500.000,
,
.
, ,
, .
, .. (2004).
,
,
LXXXIV – .2,
.
)
.
Ђ
. , (1962). К
(
Karamata, S. (2006). The geological framework of Balkan Penisula: its origin due to the approaching, coollision
and compression of Gondwanian and Eurasian units, Zapisnici SGD, SGD, Beograd.
, . (2006).
,
,
,
.
, . . (1976).
,
,
LVI,
2,
.
, . . (1980).
,
,
, . XCIII,
,
,
.
,
,
,
, . . (1976).
.
, . Ђ
, . (1991).
,
, . LV, . 2,
,
.
, . . (2001).
,
,
,
.
, . (2006).

,
, . .
,
,
.
, . ,
, .
, . (2007).

,
– . 1,
,
.

68
,

. (1957).
.IX, . 2,
, . (1964).
Ц
” . 19,
, . (1969).
XLIX, .2,
, . Ђ ђ

(

ЈЦ

),
,

.

„Ј

ђ

,

, . (1995).
,

,

.
COSNO

,

.
,

20,

,

.

,

,

. (1998).
,

.
,

К

,
,
.

,

.

, . (1974).
,
XXI,
, .
, . (1987).
,
, . (1954).

,

,

.

(1976)
.
(1976).

, . (1995).

,
1:100000,

,

.

К

1:100000,
,

К
,
, ,
,
.
, . (1995). К
К
Šafarik, J.P, (1870) Pamtaky drevniho pisemnicstvi Jihoslovanuv, Listiny, Praha.

.
,

,

.

,

.

MIROLJUB A. MILINČIĆ
MILOVAN PECELJ
Sum mary
NATURAL BASIS OF GEOECOLOGICAL PROCESSES
IN THE REGION ŽUPA ALEKSANDROVAČKA
The role and significance of nature in people’s lives, in valorization of space, and at the same time in
formation of basis of geoecological processes, is an old and common subject of interest in geography and related
sciences. Approaches in explanation of its impact are extremely divergent. The approach described in this paper is
close to the positions of environmental determinism.
The paper points out that the increasing antagonism and opposition between society and nature (disrupt
of ecological balance) make the research of geoecological processes one of the most significant modern geospatial
studies, with the increasing stress on existential context. Therefore, the perception of natural basis, as a possible
meaningful determinant of geoecological processes, is presented as a real need of modern society. This is the
argument in favour of application of geoecological science.
Natural basis of this area is presented as particularly complex, dynamic and meaningful category of
geoecological processes. It is that kind of natural basis and structure of geoecological processes that provided
geographical and individuality homogenity to the region of Župa. Moreover, it turned out that this area was a good
polygon for realization of this case study – relatively little surface, and particularly complex content.

Documento similar

Natural basis of geoecological processes in the region Župa Aleksandrovačka